My son is 21 months old and doesn’t speak. We had his hearing checked and it is fine. We’ve gone to the Speech and Language Pathologist and she says that his language acquisition is fine but he is significantly speech delayed. What this means is that he understands most of what we say and points and grunts or signs to get what he wants. He does not say “mama”, “dada”, or “Elmo”. His twin sister says all these things and more. When you compare how many words they know they are pretty much on par for receptive language. On expressive language he lags behind just a tiny bit only because we are struggling to learn signs at a pace that meets his needs.
The SLP doesn’t want me to teach him signs for everything. She thinks that by giving him signs for everything we are removing the need for him to express himself orally. She wants me to teach him the spoken word for an item and not the sign so that he will need to use the spoken word to get what he wants. I feel conflicted about this. Once we started teaching him signs for things like “cracker”, “apple”,“milk”, “book” he had so many fewer tantrums. It was amazing! So many tantrums were just about him not being understood and I’m feeling resistant on not teaching him a sign just see if I can “make” him speak.
I am learning that there is very little value in trying to “make” my kids do certain things. I can’t make them sleep or eat and I’m beginning to think that making them speak needs to be added to the list. I could refuse to give him a book to read unless he says “book” but I see that turning into a battle of wills. While I would love to hear him say “more cracker please” I’m content to repeat the signs and speak the words back to him and keep him stocked in crackers and see him giggle with glee when he sees that I do understand him.
Related posts: